Social Media Analysis · Instagram & Facebook Feb 2023–Jul 2026 · LinkedIn Jun 2025–Jul 2026
Overview
Cross-Platform
Instagram
Facebook
LinkedIn
Updates
Refreshed 2026-07-29. Adds Apr 30–Jul 28, 2026 to the dataset (249 Instagram posts, 217 Facebook posts, 46 LinkedIn posts, full history now Feb 2023–Jul 2026). Instagram Stories are included for the first time: see the Instagram tab. Full methodology notes at the bottom of this tab.
Where Each Platform Stands
Current state · plain language
Instagram
795 followers
Reach has declined every year since 2024: 189 average per post down to 151 through July 2026. Reels are the exception: they averaged 263 reach in 2026, the best on record, while dropping to just 21.6% of posts, down from 34–38% in 2024–2025.
What's happening: The best format is still being used least. Reach is still following it down.
Facebook
911 followers
Still reaching far more people per post than Instagram: 316 average in 2026 vs Instagram's 151, extending a lead that opened in 2025. People-focused posts average 266 reach vs 213 for business/product posts, and continue to anchor the platform's best performances.
What's happening: The gap over Instagram isn't closing. If anything, it's widening.
LinkedIn
Just over a year of data
The audience here is clients, partners, and referral sources actively researching THS. Average impressions climbed from 266 (2025) to 354 (2026 to date). Women of Gold ran again in March 2026: four posts averaging 440 impressions, 44% above the account average.
What's happening: The best-performing format still runs once a year. Everything else averages 306.
Data Worth Pausing On
Findings with the largest shift from the prior analysis
Instagram · A Live Contradiction
Saves vs. reach, before and after Instagram's Q1 2026 update
Instagram changed how it decides what to show people in early 2026, its biggest change in years. Saves (people bookmarking a post) became one of the top four things that decide how far a post reaches, along with direct messages, watch time, and profile clicks.
Shares 0.56Likes 0.33Saves -0.05 ←
In THS's own posts, saves barely relate to reach at all. That doesn't mean Instagram's guidance is wrong, just that it hasn't shown up in the numbers yet.
Facebook · Share Amplification
6+ shares = 9× the reach of no shares
0 shares
79
1–2 shares
194
3–5 shares
389
6+ shares
714
Only 12 of 217 Facebook posts got 6 or more shares. When people click a post, that predicts reach even better than reactions or shares do.
LinkedIn · Two Things to Know
~65%
of feed allocation goes to personal profiles; company pages get ~2–5%
81%
of LinkedIn's reported "engagement" is just clicks to expand the post
LinkedIn reports a 16.7% engagement rate, which looks strong, but most of that is just clicks to read more, not reactions or comments. Real engagement (reactions, comments, reposts) is 3.2%.
When employees post the same content from their own profiles, it reaches far more people than the company page does. The fix is getting more people to post, not better content.
Four Things to Change on the Calendar
Specific · backed by data · no new resources required
1
Instagram: get Reels back to 1 in 3 posts.
Reels averaged 263 reach in 2026 (the best Reel performance on record) while making up only 21.6% of posts. The 2024–2025 rate was 35–38%. No new equipment, no new strategy. Just the mix.
2
Facebook: hold at 3–4 posts/month, keep the human angle default.
3–4 posts/month still produces the strongest per-post reach (375). People-focused posts average 266 reach vs 213 for business/product posts, a gap that's held across the whole dataset, not just a good quarter.
3
LinkedIn: one named team spotlight per month.
Women of Gold ran again in March 2026: 440 avg impressions vs 306 for everything else, a 44% lift. It's run once a year since 2023. Monthly is achievable and the data backs it.
4
Instagram and Facebook: shift posting volume out of Morning (9am-12pm).
Morning (9am-12pm) is the single largest time window on both platforms and one of the weakest for reach: 90 average on Instagram, 175 average on Facebook. Early morning (5-9am) is a small share of posts on both, 11.7% on Instagram and 11.1% on Facebook. See the Instagram and Facebook tabs for the best time slots.
THS already cross-posts almost everything. Instagram and Facebook carry matching or near-identical captions on 188 of 196 Facebook posting days, a pattern going back to 2023. The open question isn't whether to cross-post, it already happens consistently. It's whether identical captions across platforms work as well as platform-specific framing would (see Cross-Platform tab).
Corrections This Cycle
Instagram and Facebook posting times were recorded in the wrong time zone in past reports. Fixed this cycle; some "best time to post" answers changed as a result.
Facebook's early-morning posting was previously reported as getting worse. It actually improved once the time zone was fixed.
Cross-posting between Instagram and Facebook was previously reported as rare. That was a counting error; THS already cross-posts almost everything.
Instagram still rewards content people respond to. The Reel mix still hasn't caught up.
Reels reach far more new people than other formats, and they're still just 21.6% of posts in 2026, down from 35–38% in 2024–2025. Reels keep improving every year: 206 average reach in 2024, 223 in 2025, 263 in 2026. The performance is there. The mix hasn't caught up to it.
How the Instagram Algorithm Works: Updated 2026-07-29
Early 2026: Instagram's biggest change in years
Confirmed by Instagram's head, Adam Mosseri. Four things now matter most for how far a post reaches: direct messages, saves, watch time, and profile clicks. Likes and follower count barely matter anymore.
The signal THS can't see
Direct messages are the single most important factor, and they never show up in any export THS receives. Watch time and profile clicks matter too, and they're also missing from the data.
Original content wins
Instagram now favors original posts over reposted or recycled content. Original, Instagram-made posts can reach up to 3 times more people.
What THS's own data shows
In THS's posts, saves don't relate to reach yet. That's likely because too few posts get saved for it to show up in the numbers.
Trends Over Time
By quarter, Feb 2023–Jul 2026 · new this cycle
Avg Reach per Post, by Quarter
New this cycle: zero Instagram posts published Apr–Jul 2024, a four-month gap the year-over-year averages never showed. Neither prior analysis flagged it. Cause unconfirmed.
Reel Mix % (red) vs. 5-9am ET Posting % (gray), by Quarter
Early morning posts (gray line) made up 6% to 20% of posts per quarter, a small and shrinking share.
New signalInstagram Stories
85 Stories were posted May 7 to Jul 22, 2026, the first time this data has been available. They averaged 38 reach and 49 views each (range: 12 to 152 reach). That's lower than the 116 average for a regular post, which makes sense: Stories mainly reach people who already follow the account, not new people.
Story data disappears from Instagram after 28 days, so it needs to be exported regularly to keep tracking it.
Weekly Avg Reach, May 7–Jul 22, 2026 (single window, no prior baseline)
No clear trend yet across these 12 weeks. Needs more data before reading a direction into it.
Format Performance
Feb 2023–Jul 2026 · 249 posts
Avg Reach
Reel
140
Carousel
104
Photo
103
Posts by Format
Carousel
97 · 39%
Reel
86 · 34.5%
Photo
66 · 26.5%
Carousels are the largest single format by count, but Reels still reach 35% further per post on average.
Engagement Signal → Reach Correlation
Shares
0.56
Likes
0.33
Comments
0.06
Saves
-0.05
Shares are the strongest predictor of reach in THS's own data.
Content Mix · Feb 2023–Jul 2026 · 249 posts
Business
53%
Personality
47%
Personality = team, people, culture, milestones, named spotlights. Business = client work, products, services.
Avg Reach by Content Type
Personality
130
Business
104
Personality content reaches 25% further per post on average. Both types get a similar engagement rate (17.6% Personality vs 18.3% Business), so the difference is in reach, not in how people respond.
Personality vs. Business: the reach gap holds, format is still the bigger lever.
47% of posts are already personality content (team, people, culture). Among personality posts, Reels reach 161 on average, Carousels 111, Photos 114.
Personality Reels reach further than Business Reels (161 vs 119). Business Reels get a higher engagement rate (20.0% vs 15.2%). Business and Personality Carousels perform about the same. The format matters more than the content type: Reel vs. not Reel is the bigger gap.
Instagram's shift toward rewarding saves and watch time helps Reels more than photos or carousels, since only video has watch time to earn credit for.
Format + Content Type Matrix
Personality Reel ★
161
ER 15.2% · 42 posts
Business Reel
119
ER 20.0% · 44 posts
Personality Carousel
111
ER 21.1% · 52 posts
Business Carousel
95
ER 20.6% · 44 posts
Personality Photo
114
ER 15.9% · 21 posts
Business Photo
97
ER 14.2% · 45 posts
Large number is average reach, small is engagement rate. Personality Reels reach the most people. Business Reels get the most engagement. Reach matters now; engagement helps future posts get shown to more people.
Reel Trends by Year
Reach per Reel keeps rising even as the mix keeps dropping
Avg Reach per Reel by Year
2023
22
2024
206
2025
223
2026 ↑
263
2023's 22 avg reflects the account's early ramp-up period broadly (whole-account avg reach that year was also 22), not a Reel-specific problem.
Avg Reach by Reel Duration · All Years (86 Reels)
Under 15s
82
15–30s
266
30–60s
143
60s+
99
15-30 seconds is the sweet spot (17 Reels). Longer Reels, 60+ seconds (12 Reels), actually do worse, not better.
Post Timing Analysis
249 posts · Feb 2023–Jul 2026
Early-morning posting (5–9am) is a small share, 11.7% of posts (29 of 248), averaging 83 reach. The bigger issue is where the calendar is concentrated: Morning (9am–12pm) is the largest window at 33% of all posts and only 90 avg reach. Evening (5–9pm) is the best-performing window at 178 avg but gets just 35 posts (14%).
Avg Reach by Day of Week
Thursday
171
Saturday
149
Friday
141
Tuesday
99
Sunday
88
Monday
84
Wednesday
82
Saturday's 149 avg is based on only 5 posts, directional only.
Avg Reach by Time Window
Evening 5–9pm
178
Midday 12–2pm
135
Afternoon 2–5pm
121
Morning 9–12pm
90
Early Morning 5–9am
83
29 of 248 posts (11.7%) publish in the weakest reliable window. Morning (9am–12pm) is the largest single window by volume at 83 posts (33%) but a middling 90 avg.
Best Day + Time Combinations (minimum 3 posts per cell, ET)
Day
Time Window
Avg Reach
Posts (n)
Thursday
Midday (12–2pm)
346
4
Thursday
Evening (5–9pm)
246
9
Thursday
Afternoon (2–5pm)
195
13
Friday
Evening (5–9pm)
183
8
Friday
Morning (9–12pm)
157
23
Thursday Midday's 346 avg is only 4 posts, directional. Friday Morning (157 avg, 23 posts) is the largest reliable sample on this table.
Posts That Overperformed Their Format
Reach vs. that post's own format average, as a multiplier · replaces the old flat top-10 · new this cycle
Why this changed: a simple "top 10 by reach" list would always be dominated by whichever post got the biggest one-time spike, even years later. This ranks posts by how far each one beat the normal average for its own format, showing what's actually working now.
The multiplier compares each post's reach to the typical reach for its own format (Reel, Carousel, or Photo). A post also has to beat Instagram's overall average (116) to make the list.
Caption Patterns
Word count, question marks, emoji vs. reach · new this cycle, first time caption text itself has been analyzed
Avg Reach by Caption Length
Short (<20 words)
97
Medium (20-60)
136
Long (60+ words)
92
Medium-length captions (20-60 words) reach further than very short or very long ones, the same pattern as Reel length.
Question Mark in Caption
Has a question
134
No question
112
45 of 248 captions with a reach value include a question mark. The gap holds on Facebook too, see that tab.
Emoji in Caption
No emoji
133
Has emoji
108
This runs against the usual advice to add more emoji. The pattern is weak, worth testing on purpose, not a rule to follow yet.
What to doInstagram · 4 actions
1
Set a Reel floor of 35% and track it monthly.
At 21.6%, the mix is still well below the 35–38% rate that held for 2023–2025. Reels are outperforming every other format by a growing margin (263 avg reach in 2026). Check the mix at the end of each month.
2
Keep Reels in the 15–30 second range where possible.
New this cycle: 15–30s Reels average 266 reach vs 82 (under-15s) and 99 (60s+). 17 Reels in the sweet-spot bucket, not enough to call it a hard rule.
3
Start tracking Stories deliberately, not just because this export happened to include them.
85 Stories on record for the first time, averaging 38 reach. No historical baseline yet; this cycle is the baseline.
4
Shift posting volume out of Morning (9am–12pm).
Morning (9am–12pm) is the largest window at 33% of posts (83), averaging just 90 reach. Evening (5–9pm) is the best-performing window at 178 avg but only 35 posts. Thursday afternoon (195 avg) and Thursday evening (246 avg) are the most reliable strong slots. No content change required, just a calendar shift.
Facebook's lead over Instagram widened again in 2026. People-focused posts are still driving it.
Facebook averaged 316 reach per post in 2026 vs Instagram's 151: a bigger gap than the 2025 comparison (345 vs 181). Personality content (266 avg reach) still outperforms business/product content (213 avg) across the full dataset. The account's single highest-reach post remains the David Faircloth tribute from February 2025.
How the Facebook Algorithm Works: Reviewed 2026-07-29
How it decides what to show
Private Messenger shares matter most for how far a post reaches. Up to half of a person's feed is recommended content from accounts they don't follow, a way to reach new people that Instagram doesn't give business pages as much.
Confirmed again this cycle
Reels get the biggest boost from Facebook's algorithm, followed by multi-photo posts and how-to content that gets saved a lot. No change since June.
The signal THS can't see
Private message shares matter most, and they never show up in any export. THS can only measure public reshares (0.51 correlation with reach), so the real number is likely higher.
New in this update
Posts inside active Facebook Groups get extra reach. THS doesn't have a Group presence today, so this doesn't apply yet.
FB Avg Reach 2026
316
34.7% of followers reached per post on average, vs Instagram's 19.0% the same year. The gap has grown every year since 2024, when Instagram briefly led.
Reel Avg Reach
488
vs 280 for Video and 175 for Photo. Facebook only started tracking Reels separately from Video in 2026.
Top Post Reach
1,959
David Faircloth tribute, Feb 2025, still the highest reach of any single post. That was a one-time moment; Women of Gold is the repeatable version of that kind of spotlight post.
Trends Over Time
By quarter, Feb 2023–Jul 2026 · new this cycle
Avg Reach per Post, by Quarter
Same gap as Instagram: zero Facebook posts published Apr–Jul 2024, the same four-month window. Both accounts went quiet at once. Cause unconfirmed.
Reel Mix % (blue) vs. 5-9am ET Posting % (gray), by Quarter
Facebook didn't track Reels as a separate format until 2026, so the blue line shows 0% before then; that's a reporting gap, not zero Reels. Early morning posts (gray line) made up 0% to 24% of posts per quarter.
Format Performance
Feb 2023–Jul 2026 · 217 posts
Avg Reach by Format
Reel
488
Video
280
Photo
175
Link
43
Posts by Format
Photo
147 · 68%
Reel
33 · 15%
Video
30 · 14%
Reels are only 15% of posts, but they reach the most people by a wide margin, the same pattern as Instagram.
Engagement Signal → Reach Correlation
Clicks
0.80
Reactions
0.63
Comments
0.53
Shares
0.51
Clicks now predict reach slightly better than reactions do, new this cycle. Every signal on Facebook relates to reach more strongly than Instagram's weakest signal does.
Avg Reach by Year
2023
179
2024
161
2025 ↑
345
2026
316
2026's 316 (through Jul 24) is tracking close to 2025's 345, the platform's strongest two years, both driven by people-focused content.
Avg Reach by Content Type
Personality
266
Business
213
Personality content also gets a much higher engagement rate, 15.4% vs 9.2%. Unlike Instagram, on Facebook personality content wins on both reach and engagement.
Format is still the bigger lever than content type, same as Instagram.
Business Reels average 535 reach vs 424 for Personality Reels, the opposite of Instagram's pattern. Personality content leads in every other format: Video 401 vs 236, Photo 216 vs 138. Photo is 68% of all Facebook posts.
Personality Photos get the best engagement rate of any combination, 19.1%. Reels reach the most people; Personality Photos get the most engagement.
Format + Content Type Matrix · new this cycle
Personality Reel
424
ER 9.0% · 14 posts
Business Reel ★
535
ER 7.2% · 19 posts
Personality Video
401
ER 12.3% · 14 posts
Business Video
236
ER 8.2% · 17 posts
Personality Photo
216
ER 19.1% · 69 posts
Business Photo
138
ER 11.5% · 78 posts
Large number is average reach, small is engagement rate. Only combinations with at least 3 posts are shown.
Posts That Overperformed Their Format
Reach vs. that post's own format average, as a multiplier · replaces the old flat top-10 · new this cycle
The multiplier compares each post's reach to the typical reach for its own format (Reel, Video, or Photo). A post also has to beat Facebook's overall average (238) to make the list. Four of the eight posts are 2025 Women of Gold posts, more proof that format works.
Caption Patterns
Word count, question marks, emoji vs. reach · new this cycle · same direction as Instagram on all three
Avg Reach by Caption Length
Short (<20 words)
202
Medium (20-60)
257
Long (60+ words)
229
Medium-length captions win on Facebook too, the same pattern as Instagram, on a different platform with a different caption style.
Question Mark in Caption
Has a question
355
No question
213
The biggest gap in this section: 67% higher reach for captions with a question, based on only 38 of 217 posts. Worth testing on purpose, not settled yet.
Emoji in Caption
No emoji
272
Has emoji
222
Same pattern as Instagram: fewer emoji, more reach. This doesn't prove emoji hurt reach, more likely that emoji-heavy captions tend to go with a different kind of post. Worth watching, not a rule yet.
Share Amplification
Avg reach by share count
Each extra share multiplies reach rather than just adding to it. This drives Facebook's reach advantage.
0 shares
79 reach
1–2 shares
194 reach
3–5 shares
389 reach
6+ shares
714 reach
Posts with 6+ shares average 9× the reach of posts with none. Only 12 of 217 posts hit that tier.
Paid / Organic
Only 1 of 217 posts shows any sign of being a paid boost: the 40th Anniversary video, which reached 1,225 people vs the 233 account average. Too few paid posts to compare paid and unpaid separately.
This quarter's data doesn't show which posts were paid ads, so all posts are counted as unpaid. Paid posts have been rare in the past, so this is unlikely to change the numbers much.
Post Frequency & Spacing
Facebook still rewards fewer, better-timed posts
Avg Reach by Posts Per Month
1 post/mo
401
3 posts/mo
375
4 posts/mo
304
5+ posts/mo
217
1 post/mo is based on a single month, directional only. 3–4 posts/month (9 months combined) is the reliable comparison, and it clearly beats 5+ (24 months).
Avg Reach by Days Since Previous Post
15+ days
499
8–14 days
270
0–2 days
239
4–7 days
188
The 15+ day gap (8 posts) is skewed by a few standout posts, not the spacing itself. 8-14 days is the more reliable target, backed by more posts (29).
Post Timing Analysis
217 posts
Early-morning posting (5–9am) is a small share, 11.1% of posts (24 of 217), averaging 216 reach. Morning (9am–12pm) is the weakest window: the largest by volume at 31% of posts, averaging only 175. Friday Afternoon (2–5pm) is the best reliable slot at 535 avg.
Avg Reach by Day of Week
Friday
345
Saturday
318
Sunday
226
Monday
223
Tuesday
207
Thursday
209
Wednesday
167
Saturday's 318 avg is based on only 4 posts, directional only.
Avg Reach by Time Window
Midday 12–2pm
295
Afternoon 2–5pm
275
Evening 5–9pm
253
Early Morning 5–9am
216
Morning 9–12pm
175
67 of 217 posts (31%) publish in Morning (9am–12pm), the largest window by volume and now the weakest performer. Early-morning (5–9am) is a smaller share, 24 posts (11.1%), and outperforms Morning despite its reputation.
Best Day + Time Combinations (minimum 3 posts per cell, ET)
Day
Time Window
Avg Reach
Posts (n)
Thursday
Midday (12–2pm)
831
3
Friday
Afternoon (2–5pm)
535
14
Friday
Midday (12–2pm)
393
10
Monday
Evening (5–9pm)
378
4
Tuesday
Afternoon (2–5pm)
311
9
Thursday Midday's 831 avg is only 3 posts, directional. Friday Afternoon (535 avg, 14 posts) is the most reliable strong slot on this table.
What to doFacebook · 3 actions
1
Reels are now a distinct, top-performing Facebook format: treat them as one.
Reels average 488 reach vs 280 (Video) and 175 (Photo), 15% of posts. Photo still dominates volume (68%).
2
Keep the 3-4 posts/month pace and the people-first default.
Personality content still averages 266 reach vs 213 for business/product, a gap that's held steady since the June analysis, not a one-quarter fluke. Named spotlights (Women of Gold) remain the strongest repeatable format.
3
Friday afternoon is the best reliable slot to post.
Friday Afternoon (2–5pm) is the best reliable slot at 535 avg. Morning (9am–12pm) is the weak spot, the largest window by volume (31% of posts) at only 175 avg.
LinkedIn is still a research tool, not a social feed, and impressions are climbing every quarter tracked.
Average impressions rose from 266 in 2025 to 354 so far in 2026, across 40 to 46 posts. By quarter, impressions climbed for five straight quarters, from 213 in Q2 2025 to 410 in Q2 2026, before dipping to 224 in a partial Q3 (only 3 posts so far).
How the LinkedIn Algorithm Works: Updated 2026-07-29
LinkedIn's AI (called 360Brew)
Judges posts on how relevant and expert they seem, and how long people spend reading them, not just likes and comments. Hashtags barely matter.
The first hour still matters
LinkedIn shows a new post to a small group first. If they engage with it, it reaches more people. If they don't, it stops there.
Company page reach, quantified further
Company pages now reach roughly 2–5% of people's feeds, personal profiles reach about 65%. Employees posting from their own profiles reach more people than the company page does, even with far fewer followers.
How often to post
LinkedIn recommends 2–3 posts a week for company pages. THS posts far less than that. But posting more from the company page alone won't help much without also getting employees to post from their own profiles.
~65% vs ~2–5%
Feed allocation: personal profiles vs. company pages
Updated figure, 2026
Feed allocation: company pages ~2–5%, personal profiles ~65%. Employee posts from personal profiles consistently out-distribute the company page, even with fewer followers.
Same activation question as June: are team members willing to post, and is there a structure that makes it easy to do consistently? Unchanged this cycle.
LinkedIn's engagement rate isn't measured the same way as Instagram's or Facebook's. Most of it, 81.4% this cycle, is just people clicking to read more, not reacting or commenting. Real engagement (reactions, comments, reposts) is 3.2% of impressions, not the 16.7% LinkedIn reports.
What LinkedIn Calls "Engagement"
81%
…is clicks. Reactions, comments, and reposts make up the other 19%.
Personality vs. Business, Avg Impressions
383
vs 242 for business/product posts (21 posts vs 25 posts), the same personality advantage seen on Instagram and Facebook. New this cycle: LinkedIn hadn't had this breakdown before.
Correlation: Impressions → Engagement
0.76
Likes relate to impressions most strongly, ahead of comments and reposts. Clicks relate the least, the opposite pattern from Facebook.
Trends Over Time
By quarter, since the export window begins mid-2025 · new this cycle
Avg Impressions per Post, by Quarter
Impressions rose for five straight quarters before dipping in Q3 2026, but that's only 3 posts so far, too early to call it a reversal. LinkedIn's data doesn't show post format (photo, video, etc.), so a format chart like Instagram's and Facebook's isn't possible here.
Posts That Overperformed the Account Average
Impressions vs. the account's own overall average, as a multiplier · replaces the old flat top-5 · new this cycle
The multiplier compares each post's impressions to the overall account average (306). LinkedIn doesn't track post format, so this uses the account average instead of a per-format average like Instagram and Facebook. The top post is a personal story, not a campaign post.
What to doLinkedIn · 3 actions
1
Move Women of Gold from an annual event to a monthly cadence.
Three years running, this format only runs in March, 440 avg impressions vs 306 for everything else. Status on this recommendation is tracked on the Updates tab rather than repeated here.
2
Report the 3.2% true social ER alongside the 16.7% native figure, not instead of it.
The 16.7% figure isn't wrong, it's measuring something different (81% of it is just clicks to expand). Showing both numbers keeps LinkedIn comparable to Instagram and Facebook when all three appear together.
3
Personal-profile activation: the structural gap widened, not narrowed.
Company-page feed allocation is now estimated at 2–5%, down from the June analysis's framing, against roughly 65% for personal profiles. The case for personal-profile posting is stronger this cycle than last.
THS already cross-posts almost everything.
Instagram and Facebook carry matching or near-identical captions on 188 of 196 Facebook posting days, a pattern going back to 2023. The question isn't whether to cross-post, it already happens consistently. It's whether identical captions on both platforms work as well as writing each one differently would.
BTS Video: Same Content, Three Platforms
April 16, 2026
Reach / Impressions
Instagram (Reel)
444
Facebook (Reel)
1,470
LinkedIn (organic)
720
ER%, Native Formula per Platform
LinkedIn's 17.2% includes clicks to read more. Facebook (7.3%) and Instagram (13.5%) count only reactions, so those two are directly comparable to each other.
Instagram
13.5%
Facebook
7.3%
LinkedIn (native)
17.2%
Growth Rate, Not Just Reach: All Three Platforms Indexed to the Same Starting Point
2025 Q2–2026 Q3, the only window all three platforms have data for · new this cycle
LinkedIn is growing fastest in relative terms. Instagram hasn't grown at all.
Indexed to each platform's own 2025 Q2 starting point (100): LinkedIn peaked at 192%, settled to 105%. Facebook peaked at 158%, now at 126%. Instagram stayed within 16 points of 100 for six straight quarters, now at 97.
Instagram has the lowest absolute reach of the three and is the only one not growing right now.
Indexed Reach/Impressions, 2025 Q2 = 100
Instagram
Facebook
LinkedIn
Women of Gold's pattern across platforms (Facebook and LinkedIn close together, Instagram trailing at less than half) held again in March 2026, the third year in a row. Full numbers are on each platform's own tab.
Video Format Drift · Both Platforms
IG Reels % vs FB Reel/Video % by year, same shape, different timing
Instagram's Reel mix held at 35–38% for three years before dropping to 22% in 2026. Facebook's Reel and Video combined has been more up and down, landing at 29% in 2026 (15% Reel, 14% Video).
On both platforms, Reels perform the best and get posted the least.
Video Format as % of Total Posts, 2026
Instagram Reels
Facebook Reel+Video
2026 (through Jul 24)
IG Reels
21.6%
FB Reel+Vid
28.6%
Facebook only started tracking Reels separately from Video in 2026. They're combined here for a fair comparison to Instagram's Reels number.
Questions this data raisesNot conclusions, starting points for discussion
?
Does any of this connect to leads or business outcomes?
Still unanswered from June. This analysis measures how far posts reach and how much people respond, not whether that leads to website visits, client inquiries, or new business. Answering that needs data this export doesn't have.
?
If cross-posting is already near-universal, is identical copy across platforms actually the right call?
THS already posts matching captions on 188 of 196 Facebook days. The open test: does writing different copy for each platform reach more people than posting the same caption everywhere? Answering that needs a side-by-side test, the same content with platform-specific copy vs. identical copy.
?
The most important signal on all three platforms is invisible in this data. What are we actually missing?
Unchanged from June: direct messages and private shares are each platform's most valuable signal, and none of it appears in any export. The relationships we can see (Facebook shares 0.51, Instagram shares 0.56) only count public reshares.
?
Should THS team members be posting from personal LinkedIn profiles instead of only the company page?
The structural case got stronger this cycle, not weaker: company pages are now estimated at 2-5% of feed allocation vs ~65% for personal profiles, up from the June estimate.
What to doCross-platform · 2 actions
1
Test platform-tailored captions on a handful of upcoming cross-posts.
The next test is whether writing different copy for each platform (Facebook: lead with the human angle; LinkedIn: lead with context and expertise; Instagram: write toward a reaction) reaches more people than posting the same caption everywhere. Pick 3-4 upcoming posts, write platform-specific copy, and compare reach and engagement against similar identical-copy posts from the prior month.
2
Build Women of Gold into a monthly (or at least quarterly) cadence on all three platforms.
Confirmed two years running now: 434-440 avg reach/impressions on Facebook and LinkedIn, 171 on Instagram, all meaningfully above each platform's own average. This is the single most consistently repeated finding across both analysis cycles.
Four of Seven Tracked Changes Are Working. Three Are Still Too Early to Call.
Before means everything published through Apr 29, 2026. After means everything published Apr 30 through Jul 28, 2026.
Read this as an early check-in, not a verdict. The "after" window is 9 to 16 posts per platform, a few weeks of publishing. Small samples move around on their own. Treat single-digit percentage shifts as noise.
Working
4
Instagram's and Facebook's early-morning posting share both dropped, Facebook's Reel mix and reach both rose, and personality content grew as a share of posts on both platforms.
Too Early To Call
3
Instagram's Reel mix, LinkedIn's Women of Gold cadence, and the personal-profile activation question all need more time or haven't started yet.
Recommendation Scorecard
Before = through Apr 29, 2026 · After = Apr 30-Jul 28, 2026
Recommendation
Before
After
Verdict
Instagram: grow Reel mix toward 35%+
34.8% (81 of 233)
31.2% (5 of 16)
Watch
Instagram: move off the 5-9am slot
12.1% of posts
6.2% of posts
Working
Facebook: post more Reels, the best-reaching format
14.9% (30 of 202)
20.0% (3 of 15)
Working
Facebook: shift off 5-9am toward Friday afternoon
11.4% of posts at 5-9am
6.7% of posts at 5-9am
Working
Both platforms: lean into personality content
IG 46.4% · FB 45.5%
IG 50.0% · FB 53.3%
Working
LinkedIn: move Women of Gold from annual to monthly
Ran once, March 2026
Zero posts since
Not Started
LinkedIn: activate personal-profile posting for leadership visibility
No prior baseline
Top post of the window (921 impressions) was a personal-leadership story
Early Signal
Instagram: reach is up, timing is improving, Reel volume needs another cycle to read.
Average reach rose from 114 to 142. Early-morning posting (5-9am) dropped from 12.1% to 6.2% of posts. Reel mix dipped slightly, 34.8% to 31.2%, but that's only 5 posts against 81, too small to call a trend. Those 5 Reels averaged 250 reach, nearly double the 133 average before.
Instagram, Before vs. After
Avg Reach
Before
114
After
142
5-9am Share of Posts (ET)
Before
12.1%
After
6.2%
Facebook: reach, format, and timing are all improving.
Average reach rose from 233 to 299. Reel mix grew from 14.9% to 20.0%, and those Reels averaged 607 reach, up from 476. Personality content grew to 53.3% of posts, up from 45.5%. Early-morning posting (5-9am) dropped from 11.4% to 6.7%. The best time to post now is Friday afternoon (2-5pm), averaging 535 reach, not Friday morning as previously reported.
Facebook, Before vs. After
Avg Reach
Before
233
After
299
5-9am Share of Posts (ET)
Before
11.4%
After
6.7%
LinkedIn: impressions keep climbing. Women of Gold hasn't moved off its annual slot yet.
Average impressions rose from 299 to 338, consistent with the broader climb from 266 to 354 across 2025 and 2026 (see LinkedIn tab). Women of Gold ran once in March and hasn't run again since. The top post of this window was Larry Boyd's judge-selection announcement, 921 impressions, posted from a personal profile.
LinkedIn, Before vs. After
Avg Impressions
Before
299
After
338
Sample size: 9 LinkedIn posts in the after window, against 37 before. Directionally consistent with the year-over-year trend, not independent proof on its own.
What to changeUpdates · 3 actions
1
Update the Facebook posting-time target to Friday afternoon, not Friday morning.
Early-morning share improved, 11.4% to 6.7%. Friday Afternoon (2-5pm) now averages 535 reach, ahead of Friday Morning.
2
Give Instagram's Reel mix one more cycle before treating the dip as real.
Five posts is too small a sample to call a trend, and the Reels that ran reached nearly double the prior average. Keep posting Reels at the same or higher rate and re-check next cycle with a larger "after" window.
3
Use the Larry Boyd post as a concrete example in the personal-profile activation case.
The structural case (company pages at 2-5% feed allocation vs. roughly 65% for personal profiles) is easier to act on with a real, recent, high-performing example from THS's own data than a general industry statistic.